Report no. 403


Jes Callesen
28.10.1998
Porzyme 9300 for finishers

Abstract

The enzyme product Porzyme 9300 was tested for pigs from 30 to 97 kg live weight in one herd.

The product was added to a low-energy diet - with a high content of wheat bran - and was compared to an identical diet without enzymes, and to a control diet with a normal energy content. The test comprised of 12 blocks (replicates), totalling 120 pigs per group.

The test included the following treatments:
- Control diet
- Low-energy diet + 1.0 kg/ton Porzyme 9300
- Low-energy diet without enzymes.

The test was carried out in cooperation with Finnfeeds, who supplied the product tested.

The chemical analysis of the feed showed a good concordance between the analysed and the calculated content of nutrients.

The production value of the individual diets was calculated from the production results obtained and is stated as gross margin / pen place / year using the same price per energy unit (FU) for all diets.

The low-energy diet with Porzyme 9300 added (group 2) resulted in a significantly higher (p=0.048) production value, compared to the same diet without enzymes added (group 3). This difference was mainly due to a better feed conversion in the period after intermediate weighing. However, the production value for the two groups was in both cases not significantly different compared to the control group (group 1).

In the low-energy diet with Porzyme 9300 (group 2) the actual gross margin / pen place / year was DKK 29 higher compared to the same diet without enzymes added (group 3).

The uniformity of the pigs - expressed as variation in daily weight gain - was not affected by the use of Porzyme 9300 in the feed.

All groups were significantly different from each other regarding to protein consumption per kg live weight gain. The control group had the lowest consumption, the Porzyme-supplemented group the second lowest and the non-supplemented group the highest consumption. Protein consumption per kg lean meat gain was significantly higher in the non-supplemented feed (group 3), compared to the two other treatments, which were not different from each other. This result indicates that the pigs who received the low-energy diet with Porzyme 9300 added (group 2) were able to utilize the protein content in the diet more efficiently, compared to the pigs who received the same low-energy diet without enzymes (group 3).

Overall the test showed that the pigs who received Porzyme 9300 were able to utilize a low-energy diet - with a high content of wheat bran - more efficiently than pigs who received the same low-energy diet without enzymes (group 3). This was expressed by a higher production value as well as a better utilization of the protein content in the feed. The results obtained on the feed with Porzyme 9300 added were not, on any of the recorded parameters, different from the results obtained on the control diet.

Background
Enzymes are proteins, which are naturally present in all plant and animal tissues, and they are involved in the building or breakdown of chemical bonds. Enzymes work as catalysts, speeding up chemical reactions which would normally either not progress at all, or progress at a very slow rate. Enzymes are very specific and can only breakdown certain types of bonds, e.g. the enzyme xylanase is only capable of breaking links between adjacent xylose units in complex molecules such as arabinoxylans.

Arabinoxylans are important parts of the fibre fraction in all cereal grain raw materials and their by-products (table 1). In these grains the cell walls in the outer layer (husk and aleurone) consist predominantly of insoluble fibre. By definition the cell wall material will not dissolve in the gut, so potentially useful nutrients such as protein and fat are held inside and are not available for digestion and absorption by the pig in the small intestine - basically because the pig does not secrete the appropriate enzyme activity needed (xylanase). The cell walls in the inside of the grain (endosperm) also create a potential problem for the animal as they are more soluble. This soluble fibre can cause a ‘stickness’ (viscosity) in the small intestine, which may interfere with an effective digestion in the gut of the animal.

Table 1. Typical levels of dietary fibre and arabinoxylans in barley, wheat and wheat bran (Source: Finnfeeds) 

   

Barley

Wheat

Wheat bran

Total dietary fibre, % 1)

18

11

36

Total arabinoxylans, %

7

6

21

1) Non-starch polysaccharides plus lignin



Based on this knowledge Finnfeeds has developed an enzyme product designed to improve the nutritive value of cereal grains (e.g. wheat, barley, rye, triticale) and their by-products in diets for grower/finisher pigs. The product (Porzyme 9300) contains a specifically developed xylanase, at high levels, designed to target both the insoluble and soluble fibre fractions of these raw materials. By removing/reducing the interfering effects of these fibres in the ration other raw materials may also potentially be better digested.

The purpose of this test was to examine the effect of the product on the production value - expressed as gross margin / pen place / year. The production value was calculated from the production results obtained.

Materials and methods
This test was carried out in one herd with growers/finishers from 30 to 97 kg. The experimental design is shown in table 2.

Table 2. Experimental design

Group

1

2

3

Growers diet
(approx. 30-55 kg)

Control
(1.10 FUs/kg)

Low-energy (1.06 FUs/kg)
+ Porzyme 9300

Low-energy (1.06 FUs/kg)
without enzymes

Finishers diet
(approx. 55-100 kg)

Control
(1.04 FUs/kg)

Low-energy (1.00 FUs/kg)
+ Porzyme 9300

Low-energy (1.00 FUs/kg)
without enzymes



Both the grower and the finisher diets were balanced so the content of nutrients complied with the current recommendation ("FOKUS PÅ Næringsstofnormer", 1997, Landsudvalget for Svin, DS). The content of energy was balanced to be 4 FUs higher in the control diet (group 1) than in the experimental diets (group 2 and 3). This was achieved by replacing some of the wheat with wheat-bran in the low-energy feed. The control diet also contained wheat-bran (cf. appendix 1).

All diets were produced at Dansk Landbrugs Grovvareselskab (DLG) in Viborg. The composition and content of nutrients of the feed mixtures is shown in appendix 1 and 2 . A description of the product Porzyme 9300 is shown in appendix 3. In all groups the feed was heat treated and pelleted at a minimum temperature of 81 degrees Celsius. Feed was produced three times during the test period. At every delivery all three diets were analysed for content of energy (EFOS), amino acids, calcium, phosphor and copper. Furthermore, a screening for antibiotic activity was performed on all samples of feed. Finally the xylanase-activity was determined in all samples of feed before and after pelleting in order to check for correct addition of the tested enzyme product. The analysis for xylanase-activity were carried out by Finnfeeds.

The test was carried out in one herd which had conventional health status, with its own production of piglets. The finisher unit had fully slatted floor. The pigs entered the test at an average live weight of 30 kg. In total there were 360 pigs in the test distributed into 12 blocks (replicates), totalling 120 pigs per treatment. 10 pigs were put in each pen. Each block comprised three pens, where all three groups were represented. At entry the pigs were first divided by sex, and then further divided according to estimated weight into blocks of 30 pigs. Thus e.g. the 30 biggest castrate piglets were allocated at random to the three pens in block 1, the 30 second biggest castrate piglets were allocated at random to the three pens in block 2 etc.

The pigs in each pen were fed in single space feeders with a nipple drinker. Furthermore, there was an additional nipple drinker in each pen. The pigs were fed ad libitum and had free access to feed and drinking water. The feed was dispensed manually once or twice a day.

The primary recording parameters were weight gain, feed intake, carcass weight and lean meat percentage. Secondary parameters were treatment of diseases and other slaughter data. Data were subjected to an analysis of variance according to the GLM procedure in SAS. The production value - stated as gross margin / pen place / year - was calculated from the production results obtained (primary recording parameters) and was adjusted to the same weight at entry and at slaughter. The gross margin / pen place / year was calculated as:

* Gross margin / pig

=

Sales price ÷ purchase price ÷ feed expenses ÷ various expenses

* Gross margin / pen place / year

=

Gross margin / pig * (365 days/feeding days / pig) * per cent utilization of stable.



Other assumptions used to calculate the production value were: The latest 12 months (May 1, 1997 until April 30, 1998) average price for 30 kg MS (health status) pigs (375 DKK per pig, +/-5.19 DKK per kg) and finishers (10.43 DKK per kg carcass, including bonus payment). Various expenses: 20 DKK per pig and a stable utilization of 95 per cent. The used feed price was the same for all groups (Growers diet: 1.29 DKK/FUs; Finishers diet: 1.27 DKK/FUs).

All pigs were weighed individually at the start of the test, at the shift from grower to finisher diet approximately 5 weeks later, as well as prior to the first delivery of pigs for slaughter. The purpose of the individual weighing was to determine the variation in daily weight gain within each group, as an expression of the uniformity of the pigs.

Furthermore, the total protein consumption per kg of live weight gain and per kg of lean meat gain during the test was calculated from the feed consumption and the analysed content of protein in the feed. The purpose of the calculations was to use them as an indirect expression for the utilization of the protein in the feed. The utilization of nitrogen is reflected in the deposition as live weight gain compared to the nitrogen intake through the feed.

Statistically significant differences were stated at 5 per cent level and adjusted for three comparison by a Bonferroni-test.

Results and discussion
Feed analysis
The chemical analysis of the feed is shown in appendix 2. The analysis of the feed showed a good concordance between the analysed and the calculated values. However, the content of energy in all diets was 1-2 FUs below the calculated values.

The analysis for xylanase activity in the grower and finisher diets before pelleting showed good concordance with the expected values. In group 2 the calculated values were higher then 4000 U/g and confirmed accurate addition and mixing of the product on each occasion.

After pelleting the recoveries of enzyme in group 2 were lower than the values found before pelleting. This finding suggests that the product may be lost during heat treatment and pelleting. However, the product is claimed to be heat stabile (cf. appendix 3), and according to Finnfeeds the lower recoveries after pelleting are not due to a loss, but due to the fact that some of the enzymes bind to the fibres in the feed during the pelleting process. It is suggested that addition of steam during heat treatment and pelleting of feed initiates the enzyme activation process with xylanase specifically targeting the fibre fractions in the feed. As a consequence of this, a part of the added enzymes should form tight bonds to their substrate (fibres), after which they can not be recovered in the following measurement. This activation ceases after drying the pelleted feed. When the pigs eat the feed, thus effectively adding moisture, the enzyme is reactivated in the gut and continues its effects on the fibre fractions. In this test it was not possible to investigate whether this theory is correct or if the product is lost in connection with the pelleting process.

Treatment of disease
In the control group (group 1) four pigs died, two of them due to digestive disorders. In group 2 and 3 no pigs died during the test. In group 1, 2 and 3; three, two and four pigs, respectively, were removed from test due to other reasons than digestive disorders. An average of approximately 5 per cent of the pigs across all groups were treated for respiratory diseases. There was no difference between the groups in number of deaths and pigs removed or frequency of treatments against disease.

Production results
The production results are shown in table 3 for the period before and after the intermediate weighing as well as for the whole test period. The results are adjusted to the same weight at entry, intermediate weighing and delivery of the pigs. The average weight at entry, intermediate weighing and delivery was 30, 56 and 97 kg, respectively.

Table 3. Production results

Group
Product

1
Control

2
Low-energy +
Porzyme 9300

3
Low-energy
without enzyme

Number of blocks (replicates)
Number of pigs at entry
Number of pigs delivered

12
120
113

12
120
118

12
120
116

30-56 kg:
Daily feed intake, FUs
Daily weight gain, g
FUs per kg weight gain


1.69
712
2.37


1.67
723
2.31


1.67
721
2.31

56-97 kg:
Daily feed intake, FUs
Daily weight gain, g
FUs per kg weight gain


2.73
966
2.83


2.61
935
2.79


2.65
913
2.90

30-97 kg:
Daily feed intake, FUs
Daily weight gain, g
FUs per kg weight gain
Lean meat percentage


2.24
848
2.64
59.6


2.17
836
2.59
60.1


2.19
824
2.66
59.6

All values expressed in FUs are calculated from the analysed content of energy in the respective diets.



The variation in daily weight gain in each group based on individual weighing of all pigs in the test is shown in table 4.

Table 4. Relative variation in daily weight gain, %

Group
Product

1
Control

2
Low-energy
+ Porzyme 9300

3
Low-energy
without enzyme

30-56 kg

14.5 a

14.9 a

12.4 a

56-97 kg

9.9 a

10.5 a

12.3 a

30-97 kg

9.0 a

9.0 a

9.6 a

a, b state statistically significant differences between groups within each period.


As it appears from table 4 no statistically significant differences in the variation in daily weight gain between groups expressed in per cent (coefficient of variance) was found. Thus addition of the product Porzyme 9300 to the feed, the result was not more uniform pigs expressed by a reduced variation in daily weight gain.

The total protein consumption per kg of live weight gain and per kg of lean meat gain during the test period is shown in table 5. The stated values were calculated using the analysed contents total protein in the respective diets.

Table 5. Total protein consumption per kg live weight gain and per kg lean meat gain

Group
Product

1
Control

2
Low-energy
+ Porzyme 9300

3
Low-energy
without enzyme

Total protein consumption
per kg live weight gain, g 1)
Total protein consumption
per kg lean meat gain, g 2)

433 a
100
922 a
100

443 b
102
929 a
101

458 c
106
966 b
105


1)

The results are adjusted to the same live weight at entry and at slaughter. Values labelled with different letters are statistically different.

2)

Calculated by estimating lean meat percentage to 60 for piglets at entry (approx. 30 kg).


The protein consumption for production is an expression of how good the protein in the diet is utilized. A high utilization of the protein is reflected in a low protein consumption per kg of live weight gain and per kg of lean meat gain. The protein consumption per kg of live weight gain states the consumption for total gain, but does not state, whether the metabolised protein is deposited or if it is used for energy metabolism. If the protein is used in the energy metabolism, the nitrogen will be excreted in the urine with adverse effects on the environment. This excretion can be minimized by using raw materials of high quality that is high digestibility and optimal amino acid composition. The protein consumption per kg of live weight gain can only be perceived as a production measure for the total deposition, while the protein consumption per kg of lean meat gain is a production measure for, how well the protein is utilized for lean meat gain. Thus, the protein consumption per kg of lean meat gain is an indirect expression for the excretion of nitrogen to the environment.

It appears from table 5 that the protein consumption per kg lean meat gain was about twice as high as the protein consumption per kg live weight gain - in all groups. In protein consumption per kg of live weight gain all groups were significantly different from each other, but lowest (p=0.027) in the control group. This might have been due to a higher energy content in the control diet compared to the experimental groups, whereas the protein content was on the same level in all groups. Interestingly, the protein consumption in the Porzyme-supplemented group (group 2) was lower (p=0.001), compared to the same feed without enzymes (group 3).

The same tendency appears for the protein consumption per kg lean meat gain. There was no difference between pigs receiving the control diet (group 1), and pigs in the Porzyme- supplemented group (group 2). However, the protein consumption per kg lean meat gain was significantly highest (p=0.029) for the low-energy diet without enzymes (group 3). This result indicates that the pigs who received the low-energy diet with Porzyme 9300 added (group 2) were able to utilize the nutrients in the feed more efficiently, compared to the pigs who received the low-energy diet without enzymes (group 3).

The production value stated as gross margin / pen place / year is shown in table 6.

Table 6. Production value and actual gross margin at actual prices

Group
Product

1
Control

2
Low-energy +
Porzyme 9300

3
Low-energy
without enzyme

Production value:
Gross margin / pen place / year, DKK 1)
Index 2)


681 ab
100


706 b
104


658 a
97

Actual gross margin / pen place / year, DKK 2)
Index

681
100

690
101

661
97


1) 

Daily weight gain and feed conversion are adjusted to the same weight at entry and at slaughter. The calculations are done with the same feed price in all three groups. A difference in the production value between two treatments must be minimum 47 DKK/pen place/year or minimum 7 index points, before it is statistically safe. Values labelled with different letters (a and b) statistically different.

2)

There was not performed a statistical calculation on the differences in the actual gross margin.



The production value is calculated from the production results obtained at the same feed price per FUs for all groups. Thus the price for addition of Porzyme 9300 was not included.

The low-energy diet with Porzyme 9300 added (group 2) resulted in a significantly (p=0.048) higher production value, compared to the same diet without enzymes added (group 3). This difference was mainly due to a better feed conversion in the period after intermediate weighing. The production values for the two groups (group 2 and 3) did - in both cases - not differ statistically significant, compared to the control group (group 1). The improved feed conversion in group 2 compared to group 3, supports the theory that the addition of Porzyme 9300 (xylanase) enables pigs to utilize the encapsulated nutrients and/or improve the digestibility of cereal based diets (cf. Background).

Table 6 also shows the actual gross margins. The actual gross margins were calculated on the basis of the actual price of the feed in all three groups. The cost of the low-energy diet (group 2 and 3) was - based on the composition of raw materials - 5.75 DKK per 100 kg lower than the price of the control diet (group 1). Furthermore, in group 2 the "gross sales price" of the product (Porzyme 9300) was added to the actual price of the feed. The "gross sales price" of the product was supplied by Finnfeeds and reflects the typical price that a pig producer has to pay for the product including profit to the feed company. As it appears from table 3 the difference between group 2 and 3 was reduced from 7 to 4 index points, when the price of the product Porzyme 9300 was added to the price of the feed.

In group 3 (without Porzyme 9300) the actual gross margin was higher (661 DKK) than the calculated production value (658 DKK). This was due to the fact that the feed cost in group 3 was lower than in the control group (group 1).

Overall the test showed that the pigs who received Porzyme 9300 were able to utilize a low-energy diet - with a high content of wheat-bran - more efficiently than pigs who received the same low-energy diet without enzymes added (group 3). This was expressed by a higher production value as well as a better utilization of the protein content in the feed. The results obtained on the feed with Porzyme 9300 added were not, on any of the recorded parameters, different from the results obtained on the control diet.

Appendix 1
Growers, mixes ingredients percentage

Group
Product

1
Control

2
Low-energy +
Porzyme 9300

3
Low-energy
without enzyme

Wheat

44,31

37.55

37.65

Barley

20.00

20.00

20.00

Soya meal toasted

22.20

20.30

20.30

Wheat bran

7.00

15.60

15.60

Animal fat

3.30

3.30

3.30

Dicalciumphosphate

1.20

1.16

1.16

Chalk

0.96

0.98

0.98

Rock salt

0.47

0.47

0.47

L-lysine 100 %

0.18

0.18

0.18

DL-Methionine 100 %

0.09

0.08

0.08

L-Threonine 50 %

0.09

0.08

0.08

Vitamin-/ mineral premix

0.20

0.20

0.20

Porzyme 9300

-

0.10

-


Finishers, mixes ingredients percentage

Group
Product

1
Control

2
Low-energy +
Porzyme 9300

3
Low-energy
without enzyme

Wheat

48.28

39.65

39.75

Barley

20.00

20.00

20.00

Soya meal toasted

15.50

15.40

15.40

Wheat bran

11.70

20.48

20.48

Animal fat

1.50

1.50

1.50

Dicalciumphosphate

1.12

1.04

1.04

Chalk

0.93

0.97

0.97

Rock salt

0.44

0.44

0.44

L-lysine 100 %

0.19

0.14

0.14

DL-Methionine 100 %

0.06

0.05

0.05

L-Threonine 50 %

0.08

0.03

0.03

Vitamin-/ mineral premix

0.20

0.20

0.20

Porzyme 9300

-

0.10

-



Appendix 2
Calculated and analysed content of nutrients in the mixes for growers - one delivery during the test

Group
Product

1
Control

2
Low-energy
+ Porzyme 9300

3
Low-energy
without enzyme

Calculated /analysed 1)

Calc. 

Anal.

Calc.

 Anal.

Calc. 

Anal.

FUs per 100 kg 2)

110

108

106

104

106

104

Crude protein, % 2)

18.0

18.6

17.7

18.7

17.7

19.3

Lysine, g/kg 4)
Digestible Lysine, g/kg

10.0
8.6

10.4
-

9.7
8.3

10.3
-

9.7
8.3

10.3
-

Methionine, g/kg 4)

3.2

3.3

3.1

3.2

3.1

3.4

Threonine, g/kg 4)

6.7

6.4

6.5

6.7

6.5

6.7

Calcium, g/kg

7.7

6.8

7.7

6.0

7.7

6.8

Total-phosphorus, g/kg
Digestible phosphorus, g/kg

6.2
2.7

6.5
-

6.6
2.7

6.0
-

6.6
2.7

6.9
-

Copper, mg/kg

25

25

25

37

25

33

Xylanase-activity, U/g
- before pelleting:
- after pelleting:

<100
<100

<100
<100

>4,000
>2,000

4,990 2)
2,361 3)

<100
<100

<100
<100

Antibiotic screening

-

negative

-

negative

-

negative


1)

Analysed content are based on one analysis if nothing else is mentioned.

2)

Average of four analyses.

3)

Average of ten analyses.

4)

All diets were balanced to contain identical amounts of digestible amino acid per FU.


Calculated and analysed content of nutrients in the mixes for finishers - two deliveries during the test

Group
Product

1
Control

2
Low-energy
+ Porzyme 9300

3
Low-energy
without enzyme

Calculated /analysed 1)

Calc. 

Anal.

Calc. 

Anal.

Calc. 

Anal.

FUs per 100 kg 2)

104

103

100

98

100

99

Crude protein, % 2)

16.1

16.5

16.3

16.6

16.3

16.7

Lysine, g/kg 7)
Digestible Lysine, g/kg

8.6
7.3

8.7
-

8.4
7.0

8.6
-

8.4
7.0

8.6
-

Methionine, g/kg 7)

2.7

2.9

2.7

2.8

2.7

2.7

Threonine, g/kg 7)

5.8

6.0

5.7

5.8

5.7

5.8

Calcium, g/kg

7.3

7.3

7.3

7.5

7.3

7.6

Total-phosphorus, g/kg
Digestible phosphorus, g/kg

6.2
2.5

6.7
-

6.5
2.5

7.2
-

6.5
2.5

7.2
-

Copper, mg/kg

25

28

25

31

25

32

Xylanase-activity, U/g
- before pelleting:
- after pelleting:


<100
<100


<100 3)
<100


>4,000
>2,000


5,422 5)
1,061 6)


<100
<100


<100 3)4)
<100

Antibiotic screening

-

negative

-

negative

-

negative


1)

Analysed content are based on two analysis if nothing else is mentioned.

2)

Average of six analyses.

3)

At the first production of feed for finishers the xylanase-activity in group 1 and 3 was not analysed before pelleting. Thus the stated value represent only the second production of finisher feed. The value shown is an average of four analysis.

4)

In the first sample a xylanase-activity of 1120 U/g was found, which probably originates from "carry-over" from the group 2 diet (with enzymes) , which by mistake was produced immediately before. The other 3 samples gave values <100 U/g, as expected. At the previous two productions the feed for group 2 was, as planed, produced last.

5)

 An average of 15 analysis.

6) 

An average of 47 analysis.

7)

All diets were balanced to contain identical amounts of digestible amino acid per FU.



Appendix 3 - Product description bases on company information

Product:

Porzyme 9300

Supplier:




Finnfeeds
c/o Orffa Danmark
Jacob Gades Allé 4a
DK-6600 Vejen
Denmark
Phone: +45 75 36 19 99

Contents:

Enzyme system developed especially to improve the nutritive value of wheat-based feed for finishers. The product has a guarantied minimum activity of 4000 U/g xylanase. The product is heat stable for standard conditioning/pelleting (up to 2 minutes at 90 degrees Celsius).

Price:

26.00 DKK per kg of the product. 2.60 DKK per 100 kg feed at the used dosage (1.0 kg/ton).





Toasted
Toastning betyder opvarmning til 100-115 ºC i 20 minutter. En toastning reducerer indholdet af skadelige stoffer i en råvare.
WHO
Forkortelse af: World Health Organization.
Danish Pig Production - Axeltorv 3 - DK-1609 Copenhagen V - Phone +45 3373 2700 - Fax +45 3311 2545